Issue
Old Output Expectations Survive Migration
Expectations from a prior model, prompt, schema, tool, or workflow survive a migration and continue shaping review or downstream handling after they should be replaced.
What This Looks Like
A system migrates to a new model, prompt, schema, tool, or workflow, but old output expectations remain active. Reviewers, parsers, downstream tools, examples, documentation, or prompts may still assume the previous output shape, labels, level of detail, or behavior.
Why It Matters
Migrations can fail quietly when old expectations survive. The new system may be judged against obsolete requirements, or the old requirements may keep shaping prompts and review even though they no longer match the current design. This creates confusion about whether the new output is wrong or the old expectation is stale.
Structural Signal
A migration changes the intended output contract, but legacy expectations continue to govern part of the workflow. The issue is not simply that the output changed; it is that old expectations were not retired or reconciled with the new structure.
Common Triggers
- Old examples remain in prompts or documentation
- Parsers or validators still expect the previous format
- Reviewers use prior rubric language after migration
- Workflow metadata is not updated with the new output contract
- Compatibility shims preserve legacy assumptions too long
- Migration changes the generator but not the consumers
When to Use This Issue
Use this Issue when legacy output expectations continue to affect review, parsing, prompting, or downstream handling after a migration to a new model, schema, tool, prompt, or workflow.
When Not to Use This Issue
Do not use this Issue when the migration intentionally preserves the old output contract. Do not use it for ordinary output differences unless stale expectations are still governing the workflow.
Category
Primary Pattern
Declared Patterns
Contract Drift
A structural condition where a declared contract changes but connected structures, implementations, consumers, or expectations do not update in sync.
Persistence Instability
A structural condition where persisted state cannot be stored and restored into an equivalent structure without alteration.
Redundant Declaration
A structural condition where multiple declarations produce equivalent structural effect without semantic differentiation.
Derived Primary Lenses
Conflict Lens
Detects mutually incompatible constraints, claims, states, or declarations that cannot be simultaneously satisfied.
Convergence Lens
Compares parallel structural systems to determine whether they align under shared authority.
Normalization Lens
Transforms structurally equivalent variants into a canonical form to prevent false divergence.
Reconciliation Lens
Evaluates whether structural changes align with declared authority updates, version changes, or reconciliation rules.
Reference Stability Lens
Evaluates whether structural references, identifiers, nodes, and edges remain consistent across execution cycles or comparable states.
Derived Secondary Lenses
Search Intents
- old output expectations survive migration
- old AI output format still expected
- migration kept old output assumptions
- workflow expects old model output
- old schema expectations remain after migration
- legacy output rules survived update