PENGO Workbench
Workbench / Categories / Coverage & Guidance

Category

Coverage & Guidance

Missing instructions, examples, criteria, or fallback paths.

Primary Issues

Coverage & Guidance

Format Rule Too Weak

The format instruction is too vague, incomplete, or optional to reliably produce output that satisfies the expected structure.

Coverage & Guidance

Prompt Has Too Many Valid Interpretations

The prompt allows too many reasonable interpretations, causing the AI to choose among valid paths without enough guidance.

Coverage & Guidance

Missing Fallback for Unavailable Information

The task does not declare what the AI should do when required information, sources, tools, fields, or evidence are unavailable.

Coverage & Guidance

Review Rubric Missing Required Criteria

A review rubric, grading rule, evaluation checklist, or classification standard lacks criteria required to make the review reliable.

Coverage & Guidance

Prompt Does Not Say What to Exclude

The prompt declares what to include but does not declare what should be excluded, allowing unwanted scope, sources, content, or actions into the result.

Coverage & Guidance

Diagnostic Area Has No Coverage

A known diagnostic area, failure mode, requirement, or review dimension has no Issue, check, rubric item, or workflow coverage.

Coverage & Guidance

Policy Area Has No Examples

A policy, rule, standard, or guidance area has no examples showing how it should apply to real cases.

Coverage & Guidance

Relationship Map Has Missing Links

A map of related Issues, rules, patterns, cases, fields, tools, or workflow steps is missing links needed to navigate or reason over the structure.

Coverage & Guidance

Evaluation Rubric Has Coverage Gap

An evaluation rubric, grading standard, or review checklist leaves part of the required evaluation space uncovered.

Also Related Issues

Showing 8 of 9 cross-listed issues.